500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

LEXINGTON ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

168

45%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

117

30%

LEVEL 2

152

40%

LEVEL 3

85

22%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

87

48%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

82

44%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

70

36%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

76

38%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

31

55%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

19

28%

LEVEL 2

29

42%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

82

27%

LEVEL 2

133

44%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

95

32%

LEVEL 2

115

39%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

142

48%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

128

43%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

51

62%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

59

68%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

75

22%

LEVEL 2

164

48%

LEVEL 3

88

26%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

115
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

97

27%

LEVEL 2

143

40%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

28

82%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

20

69%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

96

28%

LEVEL 2

156

45%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

105

31%

LEVEL 2

138

40%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

82
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

75

26%

LEVEL 2

135

46%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

94
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

86

29%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

28

34%

LEVEL 2

33

40%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

31

36%

LEVEL 2

35

40%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.