500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 161 PEDRO ALBIZU CAMPOS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

269

42%

LEVEL 2

250

39%

LEVEL 3

96

15%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

283

45%

LEVEL 2

224

36%

LEVEL 3

93

15%

LEVEL 4

26

4%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

134

44%

LEVEL 2

124

41%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

138

48%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

135

40%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

145

43%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

56

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

73

68%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

71

68%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

104
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

185

37%

LEVEL 2

213

42%

LEVEL 3

82

16%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

104
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

197

40%

LEVEL 2

188

38%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

177

34%

LEVEL 2

226

44%

LEVEL 3

92

18%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

199

39%

LEVEL 2

194

38%

LEVEL 3

86

17%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

92

76%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

84

69%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

103
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

176

38%

LEVEL 2

183

40%

LEVEL 3

82

18%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

107
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

172

38%

LEVEL 2

177

39%

LEVEL 3

84

18%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

93

53%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

111

65%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

27

46%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

12

34%

LEVEL 2

18

51%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

242

42%

LEVEL 2

228

39%

LEVEL 3

86

15%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

271

46%

LEVEL 2

206

35%

LEVEL 3

90

15%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.