500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 161 PEDRO ALBIZU CAMPOS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

194

34%

LEVEL 2

214

38%

LEVEL 3

113

20%

LEVEL 4

43

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

225

40%

LEVEL 2

184

33%

LEVEL 3

108

19%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

97

36%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

115

40%

LEVEL 2

113

39%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

128

45%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

47

43%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

53

47%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

124
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

131

31%

LEVEL 2

165

39%

LEVEL 3

88

21%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

116
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

160

39%

LEVEL 2

136

33%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

122

27%

LEVEL 2

183

40%

LEVEL 3

106

23%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

147

33%

LEVEL 2

156

35%

LEVEL 3

101

23%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

72

64%

LEVEL 2

31

28%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

78

67%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

145
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

125

29%

LEVEL 2

163

38%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

144
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

135

31%

LEVEL 2

160

36%

LEVEL 3

105

24%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

69

53%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

90

77%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

189

35%

LEVEL 2

205

38%

LEVEL 3

106

20%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

216

41%

LEVEL 2

176

33%

LEVEL 3

102

19%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

127
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

151

34%

LEVEL 2

168

38%

LEVEL 3

93

21%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

113
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

166

39%

LEVEL 2

143

34%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

29
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

43

36%

LEVEL 2

46

39%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

34
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

59

44%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.