500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 46 ARTHUR TAPPAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

283

55%

LEVEL 2

157

30%

LEVEL 3

63

12%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

277

56%

LEVEL 2

140

28%

LEVEL 3

71

14%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

123

48%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

124

51%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

160

62%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

153

61%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

158

59%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

141

57%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

118

50%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

124

54%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

177

45%

LEVEL 2

144

36%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

160

45%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

106

88%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

117

85%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

74
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

235

51%

LEVEL 2

148

32%

LEVEL 3

60

13%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

226

52%

LEVEL 2

134

31%

LEVEL 3

71

16%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

48

80%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

51

89%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

20

77%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

263

54%

LEVEL 2

155

32%

LEVEL 3

60

12%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

252

56%

LEVEL 2

129

28%

LEVEL 3

66

15%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.