500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 28 WRIGHT BROTHERS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

102

33%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

70

27%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

59

36%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

40

31%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

99
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

78

31%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

67

27%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

35

54%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

31

49%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

104
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

50

23%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

39

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

52

58%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

31

40%

LEVEL 2

32

42%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

94

33%

LEVEL 2

89

31%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

66

28%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

75

33%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

90
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

52

27%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

29
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

27

31%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

18

27%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.