500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 28 WRIGHT BROTHERS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

145

42%

LEVEL 2

135

39%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

111

36%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

67

39%

LEVEL 2

72

41%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

78

46%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

67

42%

LEVEL 2

59

37%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

11

30%

LEVEL 2

18

49%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

126

44%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

94

36%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

98

36%

LEVEL 2

118

43%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

65

27%

LEVEL 2

103

42%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

47

71%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

46

70%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

115

49%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

98

45%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

83

78%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

63

70%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

20

34%

LEVEL 2

25

42%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

18

33%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

125

44%

LEVEL 2

110

39%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

93

36%

LEVEL 2

102

40%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.