500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MOTT HALL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

42

15%

LEVEL 3

110

40%

LEVEL 4

104

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

38

13%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

128

44%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

19

11%

LEVEL 3

74

44%

LEVEL 4

70

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

56

38%

LEVEL 4

77

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

36

33%

LEVEL 4

34

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

51

36%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

8

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

9

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

9

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

7

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

178
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

37

16%

LEVEL 3

96

42%

LEVEL 4

82

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

188
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

30

13%

LEVEL 3

85

36%

LEVEL 4

103

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

35

14%

LEVEL 3

106

43%

LEVEL 4

102

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

97

38%

LEVEL 4

126

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

15

45%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

213
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

41

15%

LEVEL 3

109

41%

LEVEL 4

104

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

229
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

37

13%

LEVEL 3

101

36%

LEVEL 4

128

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

17

32%

LEVEL 4

28

53%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

30

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

93

42%

LEVEL 4

76

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

28

12%

LEVEL 3

81

36%

LEVEL 4

98

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

202
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

38

15%

LEVEL 3

104

40%

LEVEL 4

98

38%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

213
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

36

13%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

118

44%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

10

50%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.