500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MOTT HALL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

121

45%

LEVEL 4

62

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

115

42%

LEVEL 4

74

27%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

74

46%

LEVEL 4

46

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

77

45%

LEVEL 4

46

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

11

11%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

47

45%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

38

36%

LEVEL 4

28

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

156
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

107

47%

LEVEL 4

49

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

163
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

105

45%

LEVEL 4

58

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

118

50%

LEVEL 4

62

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

111

45%

LEVEL 4

73

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

17

57%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

30

46%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

24

41%

LEVEL 4

17

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

91

45%

LEVEL 4

49

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

91

42%

LEVEL 4

57

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.