500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 98 SHORAC KAPPOCK GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

107

42%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

131

52%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

46

40%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

61

49%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

61

45%

LEVEL 2

46

34%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

70

55%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

104

44%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

125

53%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

73

36%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

87

43%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

34

71%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

44

88%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

54
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

43
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

54

36%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

69

66%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

77

75%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

101

44%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

121

51%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.