500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/MS 29 MELROSE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

268

60%

LEVEL 2

145

33%

LEVEL 3

29

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

275

58%

LEVEL 2

155

33%

LEVEL 3

36

8%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

123

56%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

134

56%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

145

64%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

141

61%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

87

62%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

75

58%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

170

58%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

16

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

186

58%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

19

6%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

170

51%

LEVEL 2

132

40%

LEVEL 3

28

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

177

49%

LEVEL 2

144

40%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

98

88%

LEVEL 2

13

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

98

90%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

32
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

203

54%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

29

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

40
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

210

52%

LEVEL 2

152

38%

LEVEL 3

35

9%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

65

90%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

65

94%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

263

60%

LEVEL 2

145

33%

LEVEL 3

27

6%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

270

58%

LEVEL 2

152

33%

LEVEL 3

35

8%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.