500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 49 WILLIS AVENUE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

111

42%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

53

19%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

105

38%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

59

46%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

82

43%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

72

37%

LEVEL 3

80

41%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

81

44%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

83

45%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

37

45%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

27

30%

LEVEL 2

38

42%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

95

41%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

121
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

99

42%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

14

42%

LEVEL 2

16

48%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

21

60%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

57

22%

LEVEL 2

108

42%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

103

39%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

77
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

90

42%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

78

35%

LEVEL 3

87

38%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

21

40%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

18

38%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.