500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 69 JOURNEY PREP SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

101

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

68

23%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

109

37%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

51

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

58

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

43

32%

LEVEL 4

50

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

51

35%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

17

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

17

39%

LEVEL 4

14

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

145
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

79

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

157
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

89

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

39

19%

LEVEL 3

70

35%

LEVEL 4

87

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

97

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

14

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

20

27%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

174
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

55

22%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

99

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

194
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

106

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

17

53%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

23

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

84

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

86

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

162
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

92

39%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

183
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

100

38%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

9

31%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.