500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 62 INOCENSIO CASANOVA GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

121

38%

LEVEL 2

129

40%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

102

35%

LEVEL 2

97

34%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

31

27%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

77

44%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

71

41%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

23

36%

LEVEL 2

28

44%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

22

43%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

93

37%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

78

34%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

79

34%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

42

46%

LEVEL 2

40

43%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

58

56%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

89

31%

LEVEL 2

123

43%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

86
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

78

31%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

32

84%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

24

73%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

121

38%

LEVEL 2

125

40%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

100

36%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

101

38%

LEVEL 2

104

39%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

80
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

81

33%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

20

37%

LEVEL 2

25

46%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

21

51%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.