500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 62 INOCENSIO CASANOVA GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

118

41%

LEVEL 2

115

40%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

121

38%

LEVEL 2

129

40%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

43

30%

LEVEL 2

65

45%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

75

51%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

77

44%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

23

37%

LEVEL 2

27

44%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

23

36%

LEVEL 2

28

44%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

92

41%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

93

37%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

71

32%

LEVEL 2

94

43%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

79

34%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

47

66%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

42

46%

LEVEL 2

40

43%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

93

36%

LEVEL 2

108

42%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

89

31%

LEVEL 2

123

43%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

25

78%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

32

84%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

121

38%

LEVEL 2

125

40%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.