500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 14 SENATOR JOHN CALANDRA GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

64

21%

LEVEL 2

72

24%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

71

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

80

25%

LEVEL 3

110

34%

LEVEL 4

68

21%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

33

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

33

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

30

22%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

38

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

37

24%

LEVEL 3

52

33%

LEVEL 4

35

22%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

9

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

18

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

15

21%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

21

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

103
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

103
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

66

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

90

35%

LEVEL 4

64

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

32

48%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

27

38%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

156
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

56

20%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

69

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

174
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

59

19%

LEVEL 2

72

24%

LEVEL 3

109

36%

LEVEL 4

65

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

27

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

19

18%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

44

42%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

48

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

148
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

67

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

167
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

61

20%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

104

34%

LEVEL 4

63

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.