500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 182 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

144

33%

LEVEL 2

117

27%

LEVEL 3

86

20%

LEVEL 4

83

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

132

34%

LEVEL 2

92

23%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

90

23%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

41

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

67

34%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

44

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

81

38%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

65

34%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

46

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

29

78%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

21

72%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

11

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

48

45%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

49

49%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

88

33%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

96
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

75

32%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

84

25%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

83

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

84

26%

LEVEL 2

76

24%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

89

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

60

68%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

48

66%

LEVEL 2

16

22%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

166
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

122

31%

LEVEL 2

107

27%

LEVEL 3

84

21%

LEVEL 4

82

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

110

31%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

88

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

22

61%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

19

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

20

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

133

37%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

125

36%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

70

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

168
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

132

32%

LEVEL 2

112

27%

LEVEL 3

85

21%

LEVEL 4

83

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

164
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

121

32%

LEVEL 2

90

24%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

90

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

11

65%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.