500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 182 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

104

25%

LEVEL 2

136

32%

LEVEL 3

119

28%

LEVEL 4

64

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

96

25%

LEVEL 2

122

31%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

60

15%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

67

34%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

66

32%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

59

31%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

19

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

14

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

27

25%

LEVEL 2

45

42%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

32

33%

LEVEL 2

36

37%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

110
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

72

27%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

77

29%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

60

25%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

106

32%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

51

59%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

40

55%

LEVEL 2

25

34%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

182
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

87

22%

LEVEL 2

125

32%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

166
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

114

32%

LEVEL 3

106

30%

LEVEL 4

60

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

17

59%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

24

34%

LEVEL 4

16

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

15

34%

LEVEL 4

14

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

97

28%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

93

27%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

95

28%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

180
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

97

24%

LEVEL 2

131

32%

LEVEL 3

116

28%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

167
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

87

23%

LEVEL 2

118

32%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

60

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.