500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 138 SAMUEL RANDALL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

130

40%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

108

36%

LEVEL 2

91

30%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

55

33%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

47

30%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

75

49%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

61

42%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

40

45%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

39

47%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

83

39%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

65

33%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

82

33%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

69

28%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

48

68%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

39

65%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

116

39%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

101
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

92

33%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

70

25%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

14

56%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

9

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

12

31%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

126

43%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

100

38%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

90
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

97

37%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

92
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

90

35%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

33

57%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

18

39%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.