500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 138 SAMUEL RANDALL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

160

44%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

64

17%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

165

43%

LEVEL 2

135

35%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

80

46%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

84

44%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

80

42%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

81

42%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

48

49%

LEVEL 2

31

32%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

53

52%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

111

43%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

108

41%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

105

36%

LEVEL 2

115

39%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

101

33%

LEVEL 2

124

41%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

55

77%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

64

81%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

76
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

138

40%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

146

41%

LEVEL 2

133

37%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

22

92%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

19

83%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

149

46%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

154

43%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.