500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 28 MOUNT HOPE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

136

42%

LEVEL 2

94

29%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

136

43%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

56

40%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

49

39%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

80

43%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

87

46%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

22

32%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

113

45%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

105

44%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

92

37%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

88

37%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

44

56%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

48

63%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

71
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

68

33%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

68

64%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

68

64%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

133

42%

LEVEL 2

89

28%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

132

44%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

40

13%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

91

38%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

88

39%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

45

52%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

48

54%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.