500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 114 LUIS LLORENS TORRES SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

203

56%

LEVEL 2

73

20%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

155

43%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

100

56%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

78

45%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

103

56%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

77

41%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

41

48%

LEVEL 2

22

26%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

34

40%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

147

59%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

112

45%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

151

50%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

115

38%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

52

90%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

40

68%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

91

41%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

82
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

70

31%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

112

81%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

85

64%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

195

57%

LEVEL 2

66

19%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

151

44%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

115

50%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

82

36%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

88

67%

LEVEL 2

18

14%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

73

55%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.