500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 70 MAX SCHOENFELD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

228

40%

LEVEL 2

202

35%

LEVEL 3

125

22%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

218

41%

LEVEL 2

173

33%

LEVEL 3

111

21%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

95

34%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

98

37%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

133

45%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

120

45%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

54

42%

LEVEL 2

52

40%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

53

44%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

119
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

170

39%

LEVEL 2

143

33%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

107
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

163

40%

LEVEL 2

133

33%

LEVEL 3

84

21%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

160

35%

LEVEL 2

168

37%

LEVEL 3

114

25%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

156

37%

LEVEL 2

141

33%

LEVEL 3

100

24%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

68

60%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

62

58%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

120
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

137

33%

LEVEL 2

156

38%

LEVEL 3

102

25%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

123
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

122

32%

LEVEL 2

138

36%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

23
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

91

57%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

96

65%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

220

40%

LEVEL 2

195

35%

LEVEL 3

121

22%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

209

41%

LEVEL 2

169

33%

LEVEL 3

109

21%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

110
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

160

37%

LEVEL 2

158

37%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

174

39%

LEVEL 2

146

33%

LEVEL 3

97

22%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

68

47%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

44

51%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.