500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 218 R H DUAL LANG MAGNET GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

181

33%

LEVEL 2

263

48%

LEVEL 3

83

15%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

192

33%

LEVEL 2

258

45%

LEVEL 3

104

18%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

100

34%

LEVEL 2

131

45%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

145

48%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

81

32%

LEVEL 2

132

52%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

106

39%

LEVEL 2

113

42%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

14

32%

LEVEL 2

25

57%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

14

34%

LEVEL 2

18

44%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

166

34%

LEVEL 2

227

47%

LEVEL 3

72

15%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

104
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

174

34%

LEVEL 2

230

45%

LEVEL 3

86

17%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

138

29%

LEVEL 2

239

50%

LEVEL 3

80

17%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

131

27%

LEVEL 2

234

48%

LEVEL 3

100

21%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

43

61%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

61

69%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

90

22%

LEVEL 2

217

54%

LEVEL 3

77

19%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

121
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

98

23%

LEVEL 2

206

48%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

91

64%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

94

63%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

40

30%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

152

34%

LEVEL 2

205

46%

LEVEL 3

71

16%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.