500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 310 MARBLE HILL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

125

38%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

92

32%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

59

39%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

51

33%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

66

37%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

41

30%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

108

38%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

100
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

79

31%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

88

32%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

59

25%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

37

65%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

33

60%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

103
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

76

30%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

113
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

49

66%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

36

64%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

117

37%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

90

33%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

88

39%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

81
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

54

28%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

37

36%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

36
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

38

40%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.