500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

IN-TECH ACADEMY (MS/HS 368) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

154

55%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

161

50%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

75

52%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

71

46%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

79

58%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

90

54%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

136

57%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

146

53%

LEVEL 2

62

22%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

117

50%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

113

44%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

37

74%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

48

80%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

103

48%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

84
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

96

39%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

51

77%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

65

89%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

149

58%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

143

53%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.