500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 87 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

122

41%

LEVEL 2

134

45%

LEVEL 3

40

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

134

42%

LEVEL 2

135

42%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

56

39%

LEVEL 2

62

44%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

52

34%

LEVEL 2

71

47%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

66

42%

LEVEL 2

72

45%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

82

49%

LEVEL 2

64

38%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

89

40%

LEVEL 2

98

45%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

100

41%

LEVEL 2

106

43%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

21

46%

LEVEL 2

20

43%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

19

49%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

122

50%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

88

34%

LEVEL 2

120

47%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

46

78%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

46

73%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

45
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

117

40%

LEVEL 2

132

45%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

130

41%

LEVEL 2

134

43%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

14

36%

LEVEL 2

19

49%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

24

41%

LEVEL 2

27

47%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

108

41%

LEVEL 2

115

44%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

110

42%

LEVEL 2

108

41%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.