500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 19 JUDITH K WEISS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

116

36%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

101

33%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

70

23%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

57

33%

LEVEL 4

39

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

35

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

35

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

42

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

51

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

25

25%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

17

21%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

28

34%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

61

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

74

30%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

23

40%

LEVEL 2

23

40%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

18

34%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

146
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

92

33%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

69

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

32

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

40

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.