500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 19 JUDITH K WEISS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

84

25%

LEVEL 2

128

38%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

60

19%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

54

33%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

43

27%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

46

23%

LEVEL 2

80

39%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

28

32%

LEVEL 2

34

39%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

23

24%

LEVEL 2

40

42%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

100

39%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

30

48%

LEVEL 2

27

43%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

28

47%

LEVEL 2

23

39%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

124
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

61

20%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

130
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

119

41%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

23

72%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

18

78%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

48

39%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

45

37%

LEVEL 3

41

34%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

66

31%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.