500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 106 PARKCHESTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

218

40%

LEVEL 2

217

40%

LEVEL 3

98

18%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

164

29%

LEVEL 2

249

45%

LEVEL 3

116

21%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

83

33%

LEVEL 2

109

43%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

131

48%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

135

46%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

109

39%

LEVEL 2

118

42%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

55

33%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

68
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

9

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

68

43%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

52

35%

LEVEL 2

70

48%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

90

44%

LEVEL 2

90

44%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

64

33%

LEVEL 2

94

48%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

162

34%

LEVEL 2

203

43%

LEVEL 3

96

20%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

117

24%

LEVEL 2

235

48%

LEVEL 3

111

23%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

56

78%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

47

71%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

111
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

169

35%

LEVEL 2

197

41%

LEVEL 3

96

20%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

136
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

120

25%

LEVEL 2

230

47%

LEVEL 3

108

22%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

49

69%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

44

62%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

45

24%

LEVEL 2

82

44%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

119

32%

LEVEL 2

167

45%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.