500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 96 RICHARD RODGERS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

128

26%

LEVEL 2

171

35%

LEVEL 3

109

22%

LEVEL 4

82

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

156

32%

LEVEL 2

171

35%

LEVEL 3

109

22%

LEVEL 4

59

12%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

53

22%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

70

29%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

75

30%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

9

17%

LEVEL 2

21

39%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

21

41%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

41

34%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

116
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

92

30%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

99

34%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

78

20%

LEVEL 2

134

34%

LEVEL 3

99

25%

LEVEL 4

80

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

91

24%

LEVEL 2

137

36%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

50

51%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

65

58%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

186
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

103

23%

LEVEL 2

159

35%

LEVEL 3

104

23%

LEVEL 4

82

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

165
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

134

29%

LEVEL 2

164

35%

LEVEL 3

109

24%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

22

69%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

43

28%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

113

33%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.