500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 121 THROOP GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

113

23%

LEVEL 2

167

34%

LEVEL 3

128

26%

LEVEL 4

80

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

160

34%

LEVEL 2

141

30%

LEVEL 3

99

21%

LEVEL 4

77

16%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

48

19%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

79

33%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

65

28%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

12

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

13

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

124
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

72

23%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

99
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

98

33%

LEVEL 2

97

33%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

36

27%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

52

39%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

60

15%

LEVEL 2

134

34%

LEVEL 3

124

31%

LEVEL 4

77

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

92

24%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

90

24%

LEVEL 4

77

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

53

57%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

68

71%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

206
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

107

22%

LEVEL 2

163

34%

LEVEL 3

126

26%

LEVEL 4

80

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

142

31%

LEVEL 2

137

30%

LEVEL 3

99

22%

LEVEL 4

77

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

18

82%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

107

40%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.