500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 121 THROOP GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

157

32%

LEVEL 2

178

37%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

195

41%

LEVEL 2

158

34%

LEVEL 3

81

17%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

67

26%

LEVEL 2

106

42%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

90

39%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

114

49%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

88
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

103

34%

LEVEL 2

116

38%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

66
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

129

44%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

45

33%

LEVEL 2

53

39%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

49

38%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

87

22%

LEVEL 2

158

40%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

114

30%

LEVEL 2

148

39%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

70

76%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

81

86%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

153

32%

LEVEL 2

174

37%

LEVEL 3

111

23%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

118
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

179

40%

LEVEL 2

156

34%

LEVEL 3

81

18%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

16

89%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

75

37%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

120

45%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.