500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 66 SCHOOL-HIGHER EXPECTATIONS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

141

51%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

84

34%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

74

52%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

45

36%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

67

50%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

39

31%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

47

61%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

33

48%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

88

47%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

46

28%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

100

45%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

56

29%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

41

76%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

28

50%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

60
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

114

47%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

67

30%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

27

82%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

15

52%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

126

51%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

76

34%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

48
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

100

49%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

78
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

41

57%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

27

45%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.