500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 196 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

172

40%

LEVEL 2

146

34%

LEVEL 3

83

19%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

180

45%

LEVEL 2

134

33%

LEVEL 3

64

16%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

80

38%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

86

46%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

92

41%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

94

43%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

41

45%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

36

49%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

90
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

126

39%

LEVEL 2

105

33%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

137

44%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

120

34%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

79

22%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

136

40%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

52

70%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

44

68%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

110
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

111

32%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

108

34%

LEVEL 2

120

38%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

61

75%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

72

81%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

40

43%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

140

45%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.