500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 150 CHARLES JAMES FOX GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

195

52%

LEVEL 2

130

35%

LEVEL 3

44

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

169

43%

LEVEL 2

145

37%

LEVEL 3

66

17%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

73

41%

LEVEL 2

75

42%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

69

36%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

122

62%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

100

50%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

41

57%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

36

46%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

150

51%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

126

41%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

140

45%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

117

37%

LEVEL 2

130

41%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

55

82%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

52

70%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

48
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

135

45%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

110

35%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

60

81%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

59

72%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

191

53%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

168

44%

LEVEL 2

141

37%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.