500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 150 CHARLES JAMES FOX GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

222

53%

LEVEL 2

132

32%

LEVEL 3

57

14%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

195

52%

LEVEL 2

130

35%

LEVEL 3

44

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

99

47%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

73

41%

LEVEL 2

75

42%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

123

59%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

122

62%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

52

57%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

41

57%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

164

53%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

150

51%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

160

47%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

140

45%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

62

78%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

55

82%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

158

47%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

48
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

135

45%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

64

82%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

60

81%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

210

54%

LEVEL 2

123

31%

LEVEL 3

53

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

191

53%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.