500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 132 CONSELYEA SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

66

24%

LEVEL 3

106

38%

LEVEL 4

81

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

65

24%

LEVEL 3

103

38%

LEVEL 4

71

26%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

55

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

50

37%

LEVEL 4

43

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

59

42%

LEVEL 4

26

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

53

40%

LEVEL 4

28

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

9

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

41

47%

LEVEL 4

33

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

38

43%

LEVEL 4

38

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

19

35%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

30

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

42

40%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

102

41%

LEVEL 4

81

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

95

41%

LEVEL 4

68

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

17

52%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

10

27%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

186
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

105

40%

LEVEL 4

81

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

166
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

96

39%

LEVEL 4

70

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

65

47%

LEVEL 4

54

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

63

45%

LEVEL 4

55

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

27

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

24

19%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

183
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

105

39%

LEVEL 4

78

29%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

172
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

102

40%

LEVEL 4

70

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.