500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MAGNET SCH OF MATH, SCI, DESIGN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

59

16%

LEVEL 3

140

38%

LEVEL 4

134

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

71

18%

LEVEL 3

141

35%

LEVEL 4

152

38%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

79

42%

LEVEL 4

61

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

41

19%

LEVEL 3

78

37%

LEVEL 4

74

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

28

16%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

73

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

63

34%

LEVEL 4

78

42%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

19

68%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

14

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

15

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

73

41%

LEVEL 4

76

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

28

15%

LEVEL 3

73

38%

LEVEL 4

86

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

12

46%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

23

20%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

38

34%

LEVEL 4

27

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

42

36%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

121

40%

LEVEL 4

128

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

52

16%

LEVEL 3

123

37%

LEVEL 4

142

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

25

38%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

19

29%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

21

31%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

268
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

58

16%

LEVEL 3

135

38%

LEVEL 4

133

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

290
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

67

17%

LEVEL 3

139

36%

LEVEL 4

151

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

221
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

32

12%

LEVEL 3

107

40%

LEVEL 4

114

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

260
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

38

12%

LEVEL 3

115

37%

LEVEL 4

145

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

19

19%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

33

33%

LEVEL 4

20

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

33

36%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

270
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

57

16%

LEVEL 3

136

38%

LEVEL 4

134

38%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

290
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

70

18%

LEVEL 3

138

35%

LEVEL 4

152

39%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.