500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 1 BERGEN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

180

33%

LEVEL 2

179

33%

LEVEL 3

134

24%

LEVEL 4

56

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

181

35%

LEVEL 2

165

32%

LEVEL 3

118

23%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

89

31%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

93

35%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

91

35%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

88

35%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

17

37%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

11

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

155
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

170

35%

LEVEL 2

158

33%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

154
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

166

36%

LEVEL 2

143

31%

LEVEL 3

109

24%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

111

25%

LEVEL 2

151

34%

LEVEL 3

124

28%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

123

29%

LEVEL 2

135

31%

LEVEL 3

113

26%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

69

64%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

58

62%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

161
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

97

29%

LEVEL 3

106

32%

LEVEL 4

55

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

152
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

29
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

107

49%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

25
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

115

57%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

23

27%

LEVEL 2

35

42%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

162

34%

LEVEL 2

152

32%

LEVEL 3

108

23%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

158

36%

LEVEL 2

130

30%

LEVEL 3

100

23%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

185
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

176

33%

LEVEL 2

174

33%

LEVEL 3

129

24%

LEVEL 4

56

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

170
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

174

35%

LEVEL 2

159

32%

LEVEL 3

112

22%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.