500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 321 WILLIAM PENN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

403
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

42

9%

LEVEL 3

138

30%

LEVEL 4

265

57%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

418
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

12

2%

LEVEL 2

52

11%

LEVEL 3

135

28%

LEVEL 4

283

59%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

25

10%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

133

54%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

213
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

25

10%

LEVEL 3

72

29%

LEVEL 4

141

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

194
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

17

8%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

132

61%

MALE

PROFICIENT

205
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

142

60%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

33
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

27

69%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

24

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

19

66%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

314
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

29

8%

LEVEL 3

106

30%

LEVEL 4

208

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

330
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

33

9%

LEVEL 3

113

31%

LEVEL 4

217

59%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

14

41%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

14

48%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

376
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

33

8%

LEVEL 3

126

30%

LEVEL 4

250

60%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

391
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

41

9%

LEVEL 3

124

29%

LEVEL 4

267

61%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

12

28%

LEVEL 4

15

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

9

19%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

16

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

400
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

40

9%

LEVEL 3

137

30%

LEVEL 4

263

58%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

414
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

10

2%

LEVEL 2

49

10%

LEVEL 3

134

28%

LEVEL 4

280

59%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

381
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

34

8%

LEVEL 3

126

29%

LEVEL 4

255

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

385
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

44

10%

LEVEL 3

122

28%

LEVEL 4

263

60%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

10

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

20

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.