500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 115 DANIEL MUCATEL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

197

36%

LEVEL 2

184

33%

LEVEL 3

114

21%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

196

36%

LEVEL 2

171

32%

LEVEL 3

113

21%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

91

32%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

96

33%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

106

40%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

100

40%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

144
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

176

36%

LEVEL 2

170

35%

LEVEL 3

101

21%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

148
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

175

37%

LEVEL 2

153

32%

LEVEL 3

102

21%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

148

31%

LEVEL 2

168

35%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

138

30%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

109

23%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

49

71%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

58

78%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

172
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

186

35%

LEVEL 2

180

33%

LEVEL 3

113

21%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

171
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

186

35%

LEVEL 2

171

32%

LEVEL 3

113

21%

LEVEL 4

58

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

86

32%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

110

41%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.