500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 65 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

78

24%

LEVEL 4

115

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

63

20%

LEVEL 2

63

20%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

127

40%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

48

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

33

21%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

60

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

67

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

67

43%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

7

54%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

7

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

167
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

98

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

166
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

53

19%

LEVEL 2

54

20%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

110

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

106

39%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

119

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

19

43%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

12

30%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

173
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

104

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

170
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

118

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

29

41%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

36

47%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

24

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

29

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

46

17%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

91

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

60

23%

LEVEL 2

50

19%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

98

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

140
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

84

39%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

141
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

96

44%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

53
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

21

20%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

31

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

49
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

30

31%

LEVEL 2

19

19%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

31

32%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.