500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 65 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

95

30%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

80

24%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

48

30%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

47

31%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

50

29%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

18

39%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

76

32%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

76

27%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

59

20%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

19

58%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

21

49%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

113
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

61

24%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

135
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

94

35%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

34

57%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

39

59%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

19

19%

LEVEL 2

36

36%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

61

26%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.