500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 65 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

85

28%

LEVEL 3

118

39%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

77

26%

LEVEL 3

115

38%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

53

37%

LEVEL 4

30

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

40

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

65

40%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

61

40%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

157
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

106

41%

LEVEL 4

51

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

155
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

100

39%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

111

43%

LEVEL 4

60

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

102

39%

LEVEL 4

61

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

18

41%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

13

32%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

173
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

61

25%

LEVEL 3

111

45%

LEVEL 4

62

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

102

43%

LEVEL 4

60

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

23

41%

LEVEL 2

24

43%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

22

35%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

15

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

26

46%

LEVEL 4

15

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

97

39%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

126
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

81

38%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

136
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

86

39%

LEVEL 4

50

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

56
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

37

41%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

17

20%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

29

35%

LEVEL 4

14

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.