500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 65 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

106

35%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

93

28%

LEVEL 2

143

44%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

45

28%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

75

48%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

61

41%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

57

34%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

16

34%

LEVEL 2

20

43%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

23

50%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

85

36%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

77

30%

LEVEL 2

109

43%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

84

31%

LEVEL 2

109

40%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

70

25%

LEVEL 2

128

45%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

23

55%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

82
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

72

28%

LEVEL 2

102

40%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

53

20%

LEVEL 2

130

48%

LEVEL 3

77

29%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

34

67%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

40

70%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

20

20%

LEVEL 2

40

41%

LEVEL 3

34

35%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

73

32%

LEVEL 2

103

45%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.