500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 149 DANNY KAYE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

185

58%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

28

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

176

60%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

28

10%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

102

59%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

76

52%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

83

58%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

100

68%

LEVEL 2

36

25%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

119

58%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

114

60%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

63

62%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

56

62%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

145

55%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

134

55%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

40

77%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

42

84%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

32
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

156

55%

LEVEL 2

97

34%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

34
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

151

57%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

29

91%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

25

89%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

173

58%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

173

61%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.