500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 108 SAL ABBRACCIAMENTO GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

77

20%

LEVEL 2

132

34%

LEVEL 3

122

31%

LEVEL 4

58

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

76

19%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

125

31%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

31

46%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

130
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

63

23%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

128
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

59

19%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

53

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

33

32%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

42
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

25

23%

LEVEL 2

42

39%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

172
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

116

33%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

171
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

131

38%

LEVEL 3

119

34%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

20

57%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

29

57%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

27

33%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

60

19%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.