500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 108 SAL ABBRACCIAMENTO GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

134

35%

LEVEL 4

83

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

108

28%

LEVEL 3

152

39%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

74

39%

LEVEL 4

47

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

76

40%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

76

39%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

12

44%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

13

45%

LEVEL 4

7

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

22

41%

LEVEL 4

15

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

17

47%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

153
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

169
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

52

17%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

115

37%

LEVEL 4

54

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

99

38%

LEVEL 4

76

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

113

44%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

42
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

31

26%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

46
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

37

28%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

211
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

129

38%

LEVEL 4

82

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

220
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

150

42%

LEVEL 4

70

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

17

46%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

21

36%

LEVEL 4

21

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

28

39%

LEVEL 4

15

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

102

32%

LEVEL 3

113

35%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

52

17%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

124

39%

LEVEL 4

55

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

174
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

67

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

187
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

126

39%

LEVEL 4

61

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

27

37%

LEVEL 4

16

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

26

40%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.