500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 108 SAL ABBRACCIAMENTO GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

96

24%

LEVEL 2

112

28%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

134

35%

LEVEL 4

83

22%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

40

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

74

39%

LEVEL 4

47

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

12

44%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

19

34%

LEVEL 4

10

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

22

41%

LEVEL 4

15

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

142
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

77

25%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

153
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

103

37%

LEVEL 4

61

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

99

38%

LEVEL 4

76

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

62

51%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

42
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

31

26%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

189
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

100

28%

LEVEL 3

126

35%

LEVEL 4

63

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

211
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

129

38%

LEVEL 4

82

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

25

64%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

17

46%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

28

26%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

40

37%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

21

36%

LEVEL 4

21

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

68

23%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

102

32%

LEVEL 3

113

35%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.