500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 159 ISAAC PITKIN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

182

47%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

66

17%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

153

43%

LEVEL 2

127

35%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

81

45%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

68

38%

LEVEL 2

71

40%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

101

50%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

85

47%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

30

25%

LEVEL 2

50

41%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

27

22%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

103

57%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

75

53%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

44

59%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

48

58%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

144

42%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

111

35%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

58

18%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

38

88%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

42

91%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

153

45%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

122

39%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

29

69%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

31

69%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

37

42%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

116

43%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.